Movie Stars   >   Elizabeth Taylor   >   Forum

Elizabeth Taylor Forum

Few Men Found Taylor To Be That Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:51pm ET)report post
by Ivan Kipling
The most important example I can think of personally, happens to be Elizabeth Taylor. Many women I know, consider ET to be an astounding beauty. I've asked many men whether or not they agree. The overwhelming majority of those I asked, either shrugged their shoulders, or said 'no.' I get much stronger reactions from men my age and older, after mentioning Marilyn Monroe, Ava Gardner, Lana Turner, or Rita Hayworth. Vivien Leigh and Gene Tierney are rather in the 'niche' category: beautiful, aristocratic looking, eccentric.
Comment on this...

Untitled (Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:49pm ET)report post
by Ivan Kipling
One can have a high ability to assess but low standards in what one accepts.
**************************************************************
I thought the question explored whether or not ability regarding color assessment, went hand in hand with an 'eye' for beauty. I used Elizabeth Taylor as an example, because I've heard and read since I was a child, that this woman was the 'world's most beautiful.' I never thought she was particularly pretty. So I figured maybe even though I scored well on the color test . . . I still might be off base, regarding standards of physical beauty. btw: many women I know, think Liz was a great beauty. I've known very few men who agree.
Comment on this...
Untitled (Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:22pm ET)report post
by Matt
"Many women I know, consider ET to be an astounding beauty. I've asked many men whether or not they agree. The overwhelming majority of those I asked, either shrugged their shoulders, or said 'no.'"

Ivan, I totally agree with that statement you made. Many of my male friends,including myself,never found Elizabeth Taylor to be such a beauty. So many women seem to rant and rave about her and we just don't get why. Honestly, what was all the fuss about her? She was never a naturally drop dead gorgeous beauty!
Comment on this...
Untitled (Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:16pm ET)report post
by Barbara
if you look at her hard enough, Elizabeth Taylor isn't as beautiful as she's been made out to be. Her nose isn't perfect, and she needs to be photographed at three-quarter profile. And her eyes aren't really violet. Personally, for beauty I prefer Silvana Mangano.
Comment on this...
Untitled (Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:01pm ET)report post
by Chris Feliciano
So True. I've known very few men who agree that Liz was a great beauty, I being one of them.
Comment on this...
Untitled (Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:24pm ET)report post
by Justin
I never thought Elizabeth Taylor was particularly pretty either.
Comment on this...
Untitled (Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:46pm ET)report post
by Jay
Same here...I've never thought Elizabeth Taylor was beautiful... I never thought she was particularly pretty myself...never have...never will. And she never had violet eyes. There is no such thing as violet eyes. It was just the contrast of the light in the pictures they took of her that made them appear that way. In closeups she has plain blue eyes just like any other blue-eyed person. You are so right,people,all this hype and hoopla about her... geez!!!
Comment on this...

Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:03pm ET)report post
by SugarScar
Elizabeth Taylor wasn't even that beautiful. Her only extremely beautiful feature is her eyes, they are gorgeous but she has a long face, she always had a double chin, a huge forehead, everything else was insipid. And the horrible clothes, yuck.


Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:05pm ET)report post
by Oval
an oval shaped face which is the prettiest shape to have,shape face is important too. Elizabeth Taylor did NOT have a round oval pretty face.I never liked her heart shaped face because of the slightly pointed chin instead of a more pretty rounded one. So she NEVER had the most beautiful face.
Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:04pm ET)report post
by Ivan Kipling
That's true. As I say many women I know, consider Elizabeth Taylor to be an astounding beauty. I've asked many men whether or not they agree. The overwhelming majority of those I asked, either shrugged their shoulders, or said 'no.'
Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:04pm ET)report post
by Armanis
Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder! To me, Jodie Foster is a rodent, on two legs. But then I've never found Elizabeth Taylor to be beautiful, either.
Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:02pm ET)report post
by Vic
I also loathe Chaplin and never found Liz Taylor particularly attractive. But I digress.

Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:34pm ET)report post
by ella luciana
I understand why Liz Taylor is considered beautiful, but I don't find her beautiful myself.


Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:35pm ET)report post
by HighClassHo
well because she isn't. It's all about the eyes and the black hair, it kinda mystifies people.
Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:07pm ET)report post
by Ivan Kipling
Agreed. As I mentioned I never found Elizabeth Taylor to be particularly beautiful or pretty. I think it was the supposed violet eye color that caused all the hype and hoopla about her.
Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:39pm ET)report post
by ilnazhad
okay, I never thought Taylor was that physically attractive either.

Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:42pm ET)report post
by Ivan Kipling
I've never thought Elizabeth Taylor was beautiful. Nor have her eyes ever looked violet, to me.
Comment on this...
Re: Not THAT Beautiful (Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:20pm ET)report post
by Overrated Elizabeth Taylor
I never found Elizabeth Taylor
very attractive, even in her younger years. In fact, I always thought she looked a little frumpy.
Comment on this...

Untitled (Sun Sep 9, 2007 6:01pm ET)report post
by Pep
How beautiful they are, I believe there's more beautiful girls that are more beautiful than Elizabeth Taylor or Rita Hayworth, and they would never get the chance to make it into the Hollywood Spotlight.
Comment on this...
Richard Burton Reffering To Liz Taylor (Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:08pm ET)report post
by Anonymous
"She is a pretty girl but she has a double chin and an over-developed chest and she is rather short in the leg so I can hardly describe her as the most beautiful creature I have ever seen", Richard Burton referring to Elizabeth Taylor.


Comment on this...
Re: Richard Burton Reffering To Liz Taylor (Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:26pm ET)report post
by Patricia Cotten On Liz Taylor and Ava Ga
Patricia Medina Cotten: I never met Ava at MGM. I did meet her later. God, what a beauty! She was full of fun and life. Now that was a real beauty. Her face, oh! I think she was even more beautiful than Elizabeth Taylor in her prime.
Comment on this...
Re: Richard Burton Reffering To Liz Taylor (Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:13pm ET)report post
by Armanis
DEFINITELY NOT THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMAN IN CINEMA OR IN THE WORLD!
Comment on this...

Untitled (Sun Sep 9, 2007 5:38pm ET)report post
by LizzyDizzy
Oddly enough she has never considered herself a beautiful woman. She has said that she had always thought Ava Gardner was a much more beautiful woman.


Comment on this...
Untitled (Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:55pm ET)report post
by cee
everyone said she was the most beautiful woman in the world. i
don't think so. i guess it was her
eyes so they say.
Comment on this...
Untitled (Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:16pm ET)report post
by Ivan Kipling
So far as standards of beauty, I'm sure it doesn't hurt to be able to discern colors. Certainly comes in handy when decorating a room, or while dressing one's self. As for how color sensitivity affects one's ability to assess physical beauty on human beings, I can't say. I've never thought Elizabeth Taylor was beautiful. Nor have her eyes ever looked violet, to me.
Comment on this...

Untitled (Sun Sep 9, 2007 4:29pm ET)report post
by LizzyDizzy
Some of her modest films are still watchable today, contrary to their reputation, and it is the more ambitious movies which let the audience down. The much despised "The Girl Who Had Everything" is still entertaining, as is "Love Is Better Than Ever". However, "The Last Time I Saw Paris" is boring because it repeatedly flouts one of the primary rules of narrative. Again and again, there is no narrative progress within a scene, so that the situation at the end of the scene is exactly the same as at the beginning.


Comment on this...

Untitled (Sun Sep 9, 2007 4:27pm ET)report post
by LizzyDizzy
Yet neither the decline in her looks nor the scandalised response to her private life affected Elizabeth's career in the 1960s. She was able to command huge sums for making a film, although almost none of the movies were much admired. The media was now interested only in her private life and her finances, and never tired of reporting how much she had spent buying a particular diamond or throwing a party. As the decade progressed, Elizabeth's name became synonymous with financial extravagance and vulgarity. When challenged about the way she spent money, Elizabeth would dryly declare that it was good for the economy!

Elizabeth is one of the most influential films stars ever. More than any other star, she demonstrated that it was possible to have a successful career in the teeth of ferocious personal criticism, and that it was not necessary to kow-tow to columnists or pressure groups. She also demonstrated that the general public would continue to support an actor of whose private life they might not approve. Elizabeth was the first film star to demand a million dollars as her starting price for making a movie, and was also the first to demand that entire movie projects should be re-constructed around her. The demands that Elizabeth pioneered are commonplace among big stars now, but today's stars should recognise that the path was cleared for them by Elizabeth Taylor.




Comment on this...

Untitled (Sun Sep 9, 2007 4:25pm ET)report post
by LizzyDizzy
One extraordinary aspect of Elizabeth's career has not been noted at all. Whereas Marilyn Monroe became better-looking as she matured, Elizabeth's looks deteriorated early. She was far more beautiful between her late teens and mid twenties, when she was merely famous but not yet supremely famous, than she was when her name and reputation were known even to people who never went to the cinema.


Comment on this...

Ms. (Tue Oct 3, 2006 11:19am ET)report post
by Aida S.
Elizabeth Taylor has a beautiful soul.
Comment on this...
Re: Ms. (Wed May 30, 2007 9:22pm ET)report post
by Topsyturvy
Liz Taylor, she was ok but there were much prettier.
Comment on this...
Re: Ms. (Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:09pm ET)report post
by Grace
Elizabeth was beautiful but there were others that far surpassed her. Imo

Audrey Hepburn
Gene Tierney
Hedy Lamarr
Natalie Wood
Loretta Young
Sophia Loren
Edwen Fuench something like that
Pier Angeli
Maureen O'Hara
Brigitte Bardot
Marilyn Monroe
Grace Kelly
Veronica Lake
Lana Turner
Rita Hayworth
Ann Sheridan
Many more

Comment on this...
Re: Ms. (Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:26pm ET)report post
by pep
of course! there's more beautiful girls that are more beautiful than Elizabeth Taylor
Comment on this...
Re: Ms. (Fri Jun 8, 2007 11:17pm ET)report post
by wtfisthefussontaylor
I agree with Topsyturvey. I dont see the big fuss about liz either. i think grace kelly was the most gorgeous in her day. Far more beautiful than liz could ever be.
Comment on this...
Re: Ms. (Sat Jun 9, 2007 11:16pm ET)report post
by Jack
I agree with you. Liz not as appealling or as natural as many other actresses... i remember seeing a shot of her taken by Roddy McDowell in the early 50's without makeup, and not very impressive... Liz had a tendency to really lay on the makeup when she was young.. I agree that others were prettier than Liz.
Comment on this...
Re: Ms. (Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:49am ET)report post
by Matt
Liz was attractive but not that stunning. There were actresses just
as better looking as her.
Comment on this...
Re: Ms. (Sat Dec 27, 2008 2:22am ET)report post
by Matt
elizabeth taylor was never a raving beauty to me. cleopatra was the only moving she looked half way decent.
Comment on this...

commentor (Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:17am ET)report post
by dumb_bee12
I was wonderin' if any of you could help me.

I'm looking for a movie that starred Elizabeth Taylor. I forgot what the title was. All I know is that one of Tchaikovsky's songs was a recurring theme and that the story line went something like this:

There's this really talented musician. I think he was dating Taylor. But later, he dumps her, and it's this whole story about how she copes with that and such. Can any of you help??
Comment on this...
Rhapsody (Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:16am ET)report post
by Jamie
The name of the movie is called Rhapsody with Vittorio Gassman it comes in colour and was made in 1954
Comment on this...

Next Page >>
 

Post a new comment

name to be displayed*:   Remember me

* = required

e-mail:
title of comment*:
comment*:

smileys:
:-)  :-D  :-(

Never include your phone number or address in your comment. Be nice. Please refrain from inappropriate language and personal attacks. We reserve the right to delete your entry without notice. Your IP address is logged. Came across something that you or others might find offensive? Let us know by clicking on the 'report post' link.