In the Company of Men (1997)

Two bored businessmen, exiled to a remote company outpost on a six-week business trip, decide to enliven their visit by romancing a deaf woman and then savagely dumping her. Slimy Chad (Aaron Eckhart) convinces schlumphy Howard (Matt Molloy) to take part in the vicious scheme by framing it as an act of revenge against uppity womankind, but it quickly becomes apparent that he harbors some even more sinister motives. What might have been a simple exploration (some, no doubt, would say reiteration) of straightforward misogyny is elevated by the remarkable performance of Eckhart; at once charming and nauseating, his fascinating interpretation of pure competitive evil dominates the film. Neil LaBute's intelligent script is somewhat reminiscent of Whit Stillman's darker moments (minus the collegiate cleverness and zany warmth), and his direction, while rarely visually impressive, does connote the hellish impersonality of corporate interiors with chilling success. The director-screenwriter deserves additional plaudits for resisting both the tidal pull toward poetic justice and the temptation to draw either of his main characters as even slightly sympathetic. A study in ugliness, a rubbernecker's delight, a time bomb. --Miles Bethany Amazon.com

One of the Most Mean-Spirited and Misanthropic Movies Ever Made

Two alpha-male business men on a business trip, Chad (Aaron Eckhart) and Howard (Matt Malloy), set out to destroy a deaf woman, Christine (Stacy Edwards), by getting her to fall in love with them and then dumping her, in order to get revenge on women in general.

"In the Company of Men" is possibly one of the most mean-spirited and misanthropic movies that I have ever seen (I say misanthropic rather than misogynistic, since, although many of the characters in the film are misogynists, the one major female character in this film, Christine, is presented as a nice person who does not deserve to be tormented by the likes of Chad, while the male characters are presented as being complete jerks). As a result, it is not a film to be enjoyed (although I did laugh, in spite of myself, at a number of places throughout the film), but it is a fascinating and totally believable study of the cruelty that human beings are capable of. It is made all the more effective and frightening by the fact that this cruelty is executed in a bloodless (and legal) manner. If Chad and Howard were torturing people in a manner like the killer in the "Saw" movies, I could tell myself that none of this is real and that most people aren't capable of such actions, but when the weapons of torture are words rather than knives, the idea of people like this existing in the real world becomes all the more plausible. Worse still is the fact that, even while "torturing" Christine, Chad still manages to come across as being charming and attractive, which is how he can succeed in the first place.

This movie was the film debut of playwright Neil LaBute. Although the script of this film was written as an original screenplay, LaBute's stage background is clearly evident in it, and the film has a very stagy feel to it. This is the main thing I didn't like about this movie. On the other hand, Aaron Eckhart, in his first cinematic starring role, is absolutely brilliant as a conscienceless sociopath. It is Eckhart who makes this film, and from this movie, it is easy to see why he went on to bigger and better things. See this film along with "Thank You For Smoking" and marvel at the brilliance of Eckhart.
October 14, 2008

very dark, brooding, and disturbing comedy

An unbelievably brilliant, cold blooded, mean, cruel, comedic drama. This is the first movie I saw Aaron Eckhart in, and he plays his role brilliantly.

I don't want to give too much away, but his portrayal of the psychopathic mind is absolutely flawless. And it is one of those films where every time you watch it, you see something deeper - an angle, lighting, music, etc. And the ending is like - holy god. February 16, 2008

Disturbing

This movie was very good but very disturbing and VERY mean spirited. Aaron Eckhart shines and is the stand out in this role. I liked it but I am not sure it is for everybody cause it is just a nasty movie. January 18, 2008

Does it hurt?

Although this film has been around for 10 years, I never got a chance to see it until now. Originally, description of the movie was about two men on the business trip playing a crude, scheming seduction game on a vulnerable, deaf woman. Now that I have seen the film, it is so much more that what a short blip about the film weants you to believe. This film is about perfidity of seduction as much as it is about false friensdhips, corporate coldbloded fight for power, getting ahead of other people by any means possible and overall fakeness between people's relationships no matter how much we think we know them. Many of the scenes from the film are filmed in places most people familar with business trips will consider drab: airports, cheap restaurants, generic hotel rooms. There is also corporate office setup that adds to the bleakness of its characters and the story plot. Although the story itself is horrific from every possible perspective, I loved performance by Aaron Eckhart who plays charismatic Chad that finds his release in demeaning, hurting and toying with other people, their loves, careers and emotions. Chad is so emotionally empty that the only thrill he can feel is in creating his schemes that destroy everyone around him. On the surface likeable, Chad character is a reminder that things in life are never what they seem to be. If you like A. Eckhart is this film, I recommend you also check his talent is two other films " Thank you for smoking" and "Conversations with Other Women". He is very talented actor, very versatile and in my humble opinion underrated. Let's hope we see more of him in the future. Director Neil LaButte did a fine work with this film. This is a complex psychological drama. January 17, 2008

unrealistic

One guy is supposedly a sociopath. His pal's a loser with unrealistic reactions. Very little action. The acting is decent, but the characters are too simple to be believable. On the plus side, it gives you plenty of time and opportunities to turn it off and read a book. December 1, 2007

More reviews at Amazon.com ...